MABUHAY! WELCOME!

This is the blogspot for Environmental Governance (version 2.0) of Prof. Ebinezer R. Florano Ph.D. of the University of the Philippines-National College of Public Administration and Governance. This site chronicles the random thoughts of Prof. Florano on Environmental Governance. Feel free to e-mail him at efloranoy@yahoo.com. The original EcoGov blogspot can still be viewed at www.ecogov.blogspot.com. Thank you very much.

"Environmental Governance" - Definition

"Multi-level interactions (i.e., local, national, international/global) among, but not limited to, three main actors, i.e., state, market, and civil society, which interact with one another, whether in formal and informal ways; in formulating and implementing policies in response to environment-related demands and inputs from the society; bound by rules, procedures, processes, and widely-accepted behavior; for the purpose of attaining environmentally-sustainable development, a.k.a., "green growth."

Conceptualized by Ebinezer R. Florano in Florano (2008), "The Study of Environmental Governance: A Proposal for a Graduate Program in the Philippines." A conference paper read in the EROPA Seminar 2008 with the theme, "Governance in a Triptych: Environment, Migration, Peace and Order," held on 23-25 October 2008 at Traders Hotel in Pasay City, Philippines.

Mga Kandidato ng Kalikasan at Kapaligiran: May Boboto Ba?

Showing posts with label green growth. Show all posts
Showing posts with label green growth. Show all posts

Wednesday, February 23, 2011

INTRODUCTION TO, AND CRITIQUE ON THE 2009 GREEN BUILDING ORDINANCE OF QUEZON CITY



by Ebinezer R. Florano

Introduction

The Quezon City government, through its Department of Building Official (DBO), has embarked on an information campaign about its Green Building Ordinance (GBO) of 2009 and its (“soft”) Implementing Rules and Regulations (IRR) on 23 February 2011 at U.P.-Ayala Technohub which was attended by various stakeholder (i.e., contractors, developers, public sectors, government agencies, utility companies, professionals, designers, consultants, building owners, and realtors).

GBO 2009 is actually the city’s Ordinance No. SP-1917, series of 2009 entitled, “An Ordinance Requiring the Design, Construction Retrofitting of Buildings, Other Structures and Movable Properties to Meet Minimum Standards of a Green Infrastructure, Providing Incentives Thereof and for Other Purposes.” It was approved by then Mayor Feliciano Belmonte, Jr. on 2 April 2009. It will be effective starting in April 2011.

The ordinance was promulgated to “establish and maintain building standard that requires the planning, design, construction, operation, and maintenance, including the retrofitting of building projects that strictly adhere to energy efficiency, cost effectiveness, and mitigate impacts on environmental degradation,” among others.

According to the ordinance, a “green building” refers to “an integrated whole-building approach to the planning, design, construction, operation and maintenance of buildings and their surrounding land space that help mitigate the environmental, economic, and social impacts of buildings. Emphasis is on site conservation and sustainable planning, water conservation and efficiency, energy efficiency and renewable energy; conservation of materials and resources and indoor environmental quality and human health.”

The ordinance covers buildings/structures classified by the National Building Code, namely: hotels, office buildings, malls, dry markets, wet markets, and slaughterhouses (commercial); schools, office buildings, and hospitals (institutional); and factors, and warehouses (industrial).

Building owners have the option to have their buildings certified “green.” They must submit technical requirements to be able to obtain two certificates, namely: a Preliminary Certificate (PC), and a Final Certificate (FC).

To get a PC, building owners must submit proofs of the following mandatory requirements: construction activity control pollution prevention system, energy efficiency plan, water use reduction system involving water efficient fixtures, waste management plan, designated smoking area layout, and sewage treatment plan.

To obtain tax credit, building owners have the option to submit the following proofs for the elective technical requirements: flood mitigation study or reference, mixed-use neighborhood center, community connectivity, provision of bicycles and attendant storage cabinets on parking lots, proximity to transport hubs, provision of adequate parking capacity, landscape in open spaces, light-colored paving or open grid, green roof, storm water management, building envelope design, less use of energy for air-conditioning system, good natural ventilation, reduction of electric consumption, use of renewable energy system as alternate power source, water consumption reduction, etc.

After assessing the completeness and compliance with the technical requirements, the proposed building will be rated by the Green Building Inspection Unit of the DBO on the following areas: land/sites sustainability, energy efficiency, water efficiency, materials and resources, and indoor environment quality. A new building project or building renovation can earn up to 100 points. The points have equal tax credit which will be issued by the City Treasurer and City Assessor in the PC.

Those which will obtain 90-above points (super gold) will earn 25% tax credit; 70-89 points (gold) will earn 20% tax credit; 50-69 points (silver) will earn 15% tax credit; and below 50 (certified green building) will not earn any tax credit. This is the Quezon City Green Building Evaluation and Rating Table system.

The formula for the Green Building Tax Credit is: GBTC = RPT x Factor.

Where:

GBTC = maximum amount of Green Building Tax Credit

RPT = Real Property Tax (on improvement/structure)

Factor = the specific tax credit rate provided for in the Quezon City Green Building Evaluation and Rating Table.

The tax credit is good for three years.

Once the building has been completely erected, or the retrofitting/renovation has been accomplished, the DBO will issue the FC.

Critique

The Quezon City government must be commended for its initiative to “green” buildings that will be erected on its territory. This is perhaps the first of its kind in the Philippines which is worth emulating. It might even catch the attention of the Climate Change Commission which listed “green cities and municipalities” as one of its key result areas for the National Climate Change Action Plan (NCCAP).

However, during the open forum, the author was able to find out the following gaps or loopholes in the Green Building Ordinance:

• It is not mandatory. Building owners are not required to secure Green Building certification. They can opt to get the regular building permits (original and renewal). Why not make it part and parcel of the building permit issuance system?

• Being optional, there is no punitive measure for those building owners who will not get Green Building Certificates. The ordinance is a mere “carrot”; there is no stick. Is the 25% tax credit enough to seduce building owners to get their Green Building Certificates?

• The ordinance does not cover residential structures, which according to the proponents, is due to cost consideration. Considering the fact that Quezon City has 2.7 million residents (as of 2007), it should consider widening the coverage of the ordinance so as to make these residential buildings “green.”

• The ordinance, according to the proponents, covers government offices. Unfortunately, it is not clear how the tax credit will be useful to these offices because they do not pay RPT anyway. The ordinance should have made it mandatory for all government offices to be green.

• The IRR does not mention the “use of environment-friendly materials” as a criterion for giving tax credit which is unfortunate because Section 20.4 of SP 1917 mentions it. This should be mentioned in the IRR because “green/sustainable infrastructure” calls for eco-efficiency, that is, less consumption of natural resources (e.g., energy, water, land and raw materials) and less pollution during the construction and usage of infrastructure.

There were other questions and suggestions during the forum like requiring building owners to conduct Environmental Impact Assessment especially in disaster-prone areas or in areas whose biological diversity or natural settings can be affected.

Recommendations

It was a wise move on the part of the Quezon City government to have consulted the various stakeholders on the “soft” IRR of its Green Building Ordinance of 2009. However, it needs to be strengthened. First, it should be mandatory for all structures, including residential structures, if not now, perhaps in the future. Second, there should be punitive measures aside from the tax credit. Third, in its final version, the IRR should include Section 20.4 of SP 1917 requiring building owners to use environment-friendly materials in the construction of their structures.

Saturday, November 20, 2010

GREEN GROWTH by ER Florano


Figure 1: The Four Elements of Green Growth (Adopted with modifications from the original model of Woo 2009. Woo is Secretary-General of South Korea’s Presidential Committee on Green Growth)

Green Growth: Concept and Pillars

“Green Growth” (GG) is a strategy for “sustainable development.” It recognizes that the present generation, not only the future generations, must be saved from the onslaughts of natural and man-made disasters brought about by the pursuit of economic development which should not be stifled, for a win-win situation. In a more technical sense, GG is an eco-efficiency based strategy which “advocates growth in GDP that maintains or restores environmental quality and ecological integrity, while meeting the needs of all people with the lowest possible environmental impacts. It is a strategy that seeks to maximize economic output while minimizing the ecological burdens” (UNESCAP 2008a:3). In 2005, GG was adopted by 52 governments in the Asia-Pacific region, including the Philippines, as a path for development.

GG has four pillars, namely: (1) eco-tax reform, (2) sustainable infrastructure, (3) greening of business, and (4) sustainable consumption (UNESCAP 2008b:18).

Eco-tax reform requires the internalization of environmental costs in the market and revenue neutrality, i.e., green taxes should not pose as an additional burden.

Sustainable infrastructure calls for eco-efficiency, that is, less consumption of natural resources (e.g., energy, water, land and raw materials) and less pollution during the construction and usage of infrastructure.

Greening business advocates for environmentally-sustainable business practices which would require the less utilization of natural capital (i.e., ecosystem goods and ecosystem services).

Finally, sustainable consumption involves changing the lifestyle of people that would make them less eco-efficient in their utilization of ecosystem goods (all taken from UNESCAP 2008a:4).

A Framework for Green Growth

South Korea is at the forefront in operationalizing and implementing strategies for GG since 2008 through its national economic development paradigm aptly called “Low-Carbon Green Growth” which seeks “to effectively address climate change and energy issues and promote sustainable development” (ROK 2010: 24) Its motto is: “as we go green – we generate money and jobs” (Woo 2009). Its green development framework has four elements, namely: (1) clean energy paradigm, (2) green technology as a new engine for growth, (3) improvement of the quality of life, and (4) green leadership (Woo 2009). Even though South Korea has just started with this new path for development, the world has taken cognizance of its successes so far. Hence, its strategies for GG might be worth emulating.

The clean energy paradigm aims to mitigate the effects of climate change through the reduction of greenhouse gasses emissions that emanate from local industries and transportation; and the aggressive development of renewable sources of energy. This paradigm also aims to build resilient communities which can withstand climate change and man-made disasters through climate change adaptation, early warning system, the protection of terrestrial and marine ecosystems, and ensuring food security.

The clean energy paradigm is supported by the development of green technologies. Government agencies and the business sector invest on green research and development (R & D), and in cooperation with academic institutions, develop green technologies that lessen the emissions of pollution and GHGs in the atmosphere. In the process, green jobs and small and medium-scale enterprises are created. Local eco-tax is utilized not only to stop pollution but also to generate funds for green R & D.

Improving the quality of life
requires “green life revolution,” i.e., gradually reducing people’s heavy dependence on ecosystem goods and services to one that recycles and consumes less. Massive information and education campaigns on green living, whether on the road, at home, in offices/work places, in schools, or in recreational spaces, are to be undertaken to instigate this revolution.

Finally, to sustain GG, green leadership in the locality needs to be cultivated. Green leaders, among politicians and from the youth sector, must be trained on the essence of GG so that they could continue the gains of their cohorts or predecessors. These green leaders can be administratively supported by civil servants who have been oriented on GG strategies mentioned above, including the formulation and implementation of green public policies, socio-economic development plans, comprehensive land use plans; and finally, the sourcing and allocation of funds.

These four elements are interdependent – the improvement of the quality of people’s lives depend on the development of clean energy largely brought about by the use of green technology which are all supported by the political will of green leaders (see Figure 1).

References


Republic of Korea (2010). Framework Act on Low Carbon, Green Growth.

UNESCAP (2008a). The Green Growth Approach for Climate Action (draft). Bangkok, Thailand: UNESCAP.

UNESCAP (2008b). Greening Growth in the Asia and the Pacific. Bangkok, Thailand: UNESCAP.

Woo, Ki Jong (2009). “Creating Opportunities through Green Growth.” A PowerPoint presentation made at the 22nd General Assembly and Conference the Eastern Regional Organization on Public Administration (EROPA) on "Public Governance in Challenging Economic Times: Human Resource Development at the Battlefront" held in Seoul, Korea on 19-23 October 2009.

Saturday, February 27, 2010

AUDIO RECORDING OF DR. FLORANO'S LECTURE

Dr. Ebinezer Florano's lecture entitled, "Green Vote, Green Growth: It's Time to Paint Philippine Politics Green" delivered during the U.P. Academic Congress at the Malcolm Theater of the U.P. College of Law on February 5, 2010 can be heard at:

http://dilc.upd.edu.ph/index.php/beyond2010/391-qgreen-vote-green-growth

You can hear the other lectures on the same website.

Friday, January 8, 2010

U.P. ACADEMIC CONGRESS



(PowerPoint presentation copy of Prof. Florano's lecture is available at http://law.upd.edu.ph/new/Academic-Congress-February-1-5,2010/Day-5/Session-14/Prof%20Ebinezer%20%20Florano%20-%20Green%20Vote%20Green%20Growth.pdf)

Dr. Ebinezer R. Florano will speak at the U.P. Academic Congress which will tackle the general theme, “Beyond 2010: Leadership for the Next Generation” on 5 February 2010 at the Malcolm Hall of the U.P. College of Law, Diliman, Quezon City. Prof. Florano will join former U.P. President Jose V. Abueva, former National Treasurer and NCPAG Prof. Leonor M. Briones, and Dr. Edna E. A. Co in a panel that will discuss, “Election and How to Choose a Leader.” UP-NCPAG Dean Alex B. Brillantes, Jr. will moderate the discusions.

Below is the abstract of Prof. Florano’s paper entitled, “Green Vote, Green Growth: It’s Time to Paint Philippine Politics Green.”

Abstract

After conducting a brief appraisal of the state of the environment of the Philippines and the seemingly inability of the government to respond to myriads of environmental problems, the paper argues that there is a need to elect committed and competent “green politicians” to public offices in this coming May 10, 2010 elections because they are the ones who could make things happen - they have the political mandate and public resources at their disposal to formulate and implement environmental laws, policies, programs, and projects in pursuit of “green growth” or environmentally-sustainable development. However, there are uncertainties which need to be answered or clarified. Is there a green vote block in Philippine politics which can influence election outcomes? If there is, who are the green voters? If none, how can they be organized and mobilized? And, how can green voters select the greenest politicians among the lot? To respond to these questions, the paper delves into the ontological and epistemological foundation and evolution of “green politics” and “green vote,” then focuses on their existence (or absence) in Philippine politics. The second half of the paper provides methods and strategies that can be employed by Filipino voters to evaluate and select the greenest politicians.

Tuesday, December 8, 2009

ABOUT THE "GREEN VOTE, GREEN GROWTH" MOVEMENT

GREEN GROWTH, GREEN VOTE (GVGG) is a civic non-profit movement that aims to support the candidacies of pro-environment national and local politicians this coming May 10, 2010 elections. GVGG's support cuts across political boundaries.*

VISION:

A Philippine political system which encourages voters to elect pro-environment politicians into public offices.

MISSION:

1. To educate the general public on the connection of voting for pro-environment politicians who support environmentally-sustainable development or green growth; and
2. To support the candidacies of pro-environment national and local politicians during election periods.

OBJECTIVES:

This coming May 10, 2010 elections:

1. To hold fora with national and local politicians on the topic: “How Green Is Your Candidate?” in all cities, municipalities, and provinces in the Philippines; and
2. To mobilize voters to elect pro-environment national and local candidates through the use of ICTs and the simple act of wearing/tying green ribbons. .

(*Note: Please write "Green Vote, Green Growth" on your ribbons to distinguish us from political parties with green motif).